Evidence and limits
Finding: Limited ability to modify algorithmic forecasts increased use and improved performance, apparently by restoring some control.
Impact: Watch bounded editability and contestability. Reject user control as evidence that the combined result is accurate or fair.
Boundary: Numeric forecasting with restricted edits is narrower than repository work. Next: which edits improve correction without creating untraceable overrides?
Flags: limited numeric edits; use is not correctness
Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement
What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation