Evidence and limits
Finding: Robot performance and attributes were stronger trust predictors than environmental factors in the reviewed evidence.
Impact: Strengthen performance-history evidence. Reject trust as appropriate reliance and anthropomorphic presentation as competence evidence.
Boundary: Human-robot interaction differs from language-agent work and trust is not calibration. Next: which performance-history display improves decisions rather than only confidence?
Flags: robot interaction; trust is not reliance
Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement
What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation