Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: Higher automation improved routine performance and workload but reduced situation awareness and failure performance, especially across the analysis-to-action-selection boundary.

Impact: Strengthen function-specific benefit and recovery measurement. Reject one global automation level.

Boundary: The studies vary and mostly predate LLM systems. Next: do the same tradeoffs appear when generative agents move from analysis to consequential action?

Flags: classical automation studies; heterogeneous stages

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 24. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 23. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence