Measuring Team Knowledge

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: Team knowledge includes both shared and distributed structures, so individual knowledge aggregation can miss coordination-relevant organization.

Impact: Strengthen separate tests for common ground and distributed expertise. Reject one pooled knowledge measure.

Boundary: Measurement methods are task-sensitive and human-team focused. Next: which representation preserves specialization while still testing shared constraints?

Flags: human-team measures; construct heterogeneity

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 91. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 90. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence