Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: Failures reduced trust more than successes increased it, and adjustments also reflected outcome bias and contrast with the participant's own result.

Impact: Strengthen event-sequence reliance measurement. Reject one post-task trust snapshot as a sufficient account of collaboration.

Boundary: The task was bounded image recognition and trust was self-reported after each trial. Next: which behavioral measures capture dynamic reliance without requiring intrusive continuous surveys?

Flags: small sample; aided-recognition task

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

No appearance in the chart editions included in this snapshot. This is not evidence of absence from other editions.