Evidence and limits
Finding: Trustworthy joint activity depends on responding to changing situations and recovering from mismatches, not only on initial calibration or reliability.
Impact: Strengthen responsivity and recovery as separate protocol outcomes. Reject static trust calibration as sufficient continuity evidence.
Boundary: This is a conceptual synthesis, not a controlled evaluation of a generative workflow. Next: which traces show that a participant noticed, communicated, and recovered from a changed situation?
Flags: no direct generative-agent test
Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement
What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation