Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: Overreliance, underuse, and inappropriate automation imposed by designers or managers are distinct failure modes rather than one trust problem.

Impact: Strengthen separate reliance, disuse, and designer-authority checks. Reject adoption rate as evidence of appropriate collaboration.

Boundary: The framework predates modern generative systems and supplies categories rather than a deployment test. Next: which observable workflow events distinguish justified nonuse from harmful disuse?

Flags: classical automation transfer; heterogeneous domains

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 21. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 20. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence