Evidence and limits
Finding: Allowing AI tools increased completion time by 19%, even though participants expected and later believed that AI made them faster.
Impact: Strengthen observed-versus-perceived outcome checks. Reject self-reported speed as evaluation evidence.
Boundary: The sample is small, unusually experienced, and limited to early-2025 tools and familiar repositories. Next: which task and familiarity features predict when assistance becomes overhead?
Flags: small participant count; early-2025 tools; open-source setting
Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement
What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation