Generative AI at Work

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: AI assistance increased issues resolved per hour by about 15% on average, with larger gains for less experienced and lower-skilled workers. The highest-skilled group saw smaller gains and some quality decline.

Impact: Strengthen expertise-sensitive baselines and distributional reporting. Reject one average productivity effect as a routing rule.

Boundary: One support setting with a purpose-built assistant does not establish transfer to open-ended work. Next: when does AI diffuse expert practice without flattening expert judgment?

Flags: selection and rollout confounding; support-work domain

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 70. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 69. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence