Evidence and limits
Finding: Repeated interaction with biased AI altered human judgments and amplified bias more than comparable human interaction. Participants often underestimated the AI influence.
Impact: Strengthen correction, counterevidence, and independence checks. Reject passive repeated exposure as a safe reliance model.
Boundary: Judgment tasks and selected algorithms do not map directly to repository work. Next: which correction and provenance signals reduce feedback-loop effects in sustained, open-ended collaboration?
Flags: perceptual and social-task transfer
Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement
What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation